Blaming Fate to Escape Responsibility
It seems that the Plastic Fool has no intention of stopping his attempts to manipulate people and influence how they perceive the situation. But the individual has no intention of stopping either. He will continue exposing the Plastic Fool’s manipulation and make his money evaporate infront of his own eyes.
This time, the Plastic Fool has convinced some people that what is happening to the individual is God’s will and that he has nothing to do with it. The individual should simply accept his fate, endure his suffering and imprisonment, and stop exposing the Plastic Fool’s manipulation.
Why? Because, in the Plastic Fool’s version of events, exposing him is equivalent to stealing his money.
What a convenient arrangement! The individual is expected to accept his suffering as fate, while the person he holds responsible gets to walk away without answering for anything.
But the individual sees things differently. He maintains that the Plastic Fool, not God or fate, is responsible for keeping him imprisoned. He does not present this as a prediction or a guess; he insists that it is the reality of his situation, whether others believe him or not.
A Pattern of Broken Promises
According to the individual, this is not an isolated incident. It has happened at least twice.
The first time, the Plastic Fool was supposed to pay the individual before the individual leaves Mickey Mouse Land. The two had agreed on the terms, but the Plastic Fool out of greed suddenly went back on that agreement and extended the game to his own hometown.
The individual believes the strategy was to make him lose hope when he sees people from his own community turn against him. The expectation, as the individual understands it, was that he would eventually break, leaving the Plastic Fool to claim all the money.
The second incident allegedly occurred last month. Toward the end of the month, a meeting was held to decide whether the individual would be released. And who was the only person who opposed that outcome?
Yes, the Plastic Fool.
The individual maintains that the Plastic Fool used his influence and resources to ensure that he remained imprisoned, once again.
For the individual, these incidents point to a recurring pattern: promises are made, agreements are reached, and then the conditions suddenly change when the outcome no longer serves the Plastic Fool’s interests.
If One Must Suffer, the Truth Will Still Come Out
The individual has decided that he will not waste his energy fighting circumstances beyond his control. If he must continue suffering under the circumstances he attributes to the Plastic Fool, then so be it. But he refuses to let that suffering silence him.
The Plastic Fool may have assumed for a long time that keeping the individual imprisoned would have no consequences for him. Yet the individual believes that events have repeatedly proved this assumption wrong.
Today, according to the individual, the Plastic Fool has lost what he once possessed because of his own greed and false sense of superiority. He may have far less left to gamble with than before, but the individual believes that his arrogance will continue to lead him toward further losses.
So stop feeling sorry for someone simply because he presents himself as a victim. And do not lend him your ears so that he can fill them with stories that serve his own interests. Of course, you are free to keep listening if you prefer.
Either way, the individual has made his position clear: he will continue telling his side of the story, challenging the Plastic Fool’s narrative, and exposing what he believes to be the truth behind the performance.
The Plastic Fool may still have money, influence, or people willing to listen to him. But none of those things can guarantee that he will control the story forever.
And sometimes, the most expensive mistake a person can make is believing that money can buy the final word.
