A Neighbor Worth Noticing
As we exposed the hog in the farm of pigs, it is only fair to turn our attention to the Plastic King, who conveniently stands right next to the farm—accompanied, of course, by his loyal Masonic followers.
Why is he standing there?
Not to intervene.
Not to correct anything.
But simply to watch the show—observing what the hog is doing and, more importantly, how the individual reacts.
Front-row seat. No responsibility included.
The Silence of a King
Now, one might ask a very simple question:
Why doesn’t the Plastic King defend himself against the hog’s accusations or at least the plastic prince defends his king’s honor?
A reasonable question. Unfortunately, reasonable answers are not always available in the plastic kingdom.
There are three possible explanations.
Scenario One: The Strategic Observer
In the first scenario, the king is patiently waiting to see whether the individual will fall into the trap.
If he does, perfect.
That single mistake can then be used to discredit every fact the individual has ever presented—and, naturally, to delay his money even further.
Because, as we all know by now, they hold an exclusive license on morality.
Scenario Two: Choosing Sides
In the second scenario, the king and the hog are simply trying to determine which side the individual will choose.
The hope is that, once he picks a side, he becomes easier to categorize, easier to manipulate, and easier to absorb into the game.
Even if the individual is only standing with the truth—
which, inconveniently, might happen to align with one side or another.
Nuance, after all, is not very popular in binary systems.
Scenario Three: A Truly Inspired Masterpiece
Of course, there’s always a third possibility—the truly brilliant one.
The entire “Plastic King killed his father” story might have been carefully crafted by the Plastic King and his Plastic Prince themselves.
Why? Pure genius, really: to discredit the individual, steal his money or to conveniently throw him back into the hog’s playground—again.
Because when you can’t win with truth, you might as well manufacture something dramatic and call it strategy.
Still Not Getting It
And yet, after more than a year, they still fail to understand something very simple:
The individual is not here to join a side.
He is here to end the game—or, more precisely, to end their version of it.
A Small Cognitive Limitation
But then again, expecting such clarity might be unfair.
After all, how do you explain logic to something operating on a single-cell level of understanding?
It’s a tough audience.
